- GA, MT, ND, SC, TX, VA (12% of States in U.S.)
Revised and updated as of February 1, 2007
Georgia
- HB 1
www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2007_08/fulltext/hb1.htm
Type bill:
state-level abortion ban bill; also asserts fetal personhood as
legislative finding of fact
(bans all surgical abortions; bill may ban all chemical abortions)
Bill Status:
11/15/2006 House Prefiled
01/09/2007 House First Readers
01/10/2007 House Second Readers
Montana - HB 403
http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2007/billhtml/HB0403.htm
Type bill: state-level constitutional personhood bill
(bans all abortions, surgical and chemical)
(bill for Montana state constitutional amendment to be voted on
by referendum on Nov. 2008 ballot)
Bill Status:
H) Hearing 02/02/2007 (H) Judiciary
(H) Referred to Committee 01/19/2007 (H) Judiciary
(H) Introduced 01/19/2007
(H) First Reading 01/19/2007
North
Dakota - HB 1489
www.legis.nd.gov/assembly/60-2007/bill-index/bi1489.html
Type bill:
state-level abortion ban bill; does not assert legal personhood
(bans all surgical abortions; bill does not ban all chemical abortions)
Bill Status:
01/15/07 House Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary
01/22/07 House Committee Hearing
01/25/07 House Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar y
013 n 000
01/26/07 House Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 020 nays 069
North Dakota - HB 1466
www.legis.nd.gov/assembly/60-2007/bill-actions/ba1466.html
Type bill:
state-level abortion ban bill with a life-of-the-mother exception;
does not assert legal personhood
(bans all surgical abortions except does not ban abortions
to "prevent the pregnant female's death";
bill does not ban all chemical abortions)
("trigger" bill - does not go into effect until Roe v. Wade overturned)
Bill Status:
01/15 House Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary
01/22 House Committee Hearing
01/25 House Reported back, do pass, placed on calendar y 008 n
004
01/26 House Second reading, passed, yeas 061 nays 026
01/29 Senate Received from House
South Carolina - H.3284
www.scstatehouse.net/sess117_2007-2008/bills/3284.htm
Type bill:
state-level statutory personhood bill
(bans all abortions, surgical and chemical)
Bill Status:
1/17/2007 House Introduced and read first time
1/17/2007 House Referred to Committee on Judiciary
Texas - HB 175
www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=80R&Bill=HB175
Type Bill:
state-level abortion ban bill with a life-of-the-mother exception;
does not assert legal personhood
(bans all surgical abortions except does not ban abortions
to prevent "the death of the mother ";
bill does not ban all chemical abortions)
("trigger" bill - does not go into effect until Roe v. Wade overturned)
Bill Status:
H Referred to State Affairs 01/30/2007
H Read first time 01/30/2007
H Filed 11/13/2006
Texas - SB 186
www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=80R&Bill=SB186
Type bill:
state-level abortion ban bill with a life-of-the-mother exception;
does not assert legal personhood
(bans all surgical abortions except does not ban abortions
to prevent "the death of the mother ";
bill does not ban all chemical abortions)
("trigger" bill - does not go into effect until Roe v. Wade overturned)
Bill Status:
S Referred to State Affairs 01/29/2007
S Read first time 01/29/2007
S Filed 01/10/2007
Virginia - HB 2797
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?071+ful+HB2797
Type bill: state-level statutory right to life at fertilization
bill; does not assert legal personhood
(bans all abortions, surgical and chemical)
Bill Status:
01/10/07 House: Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/10/07
074442220
01/10/07 House: Referred to Committee on Privileges and Elections
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
Change in CCL's state-level abortion ban bill reporting standard
for 2007:
This year, for 2007 reporting of state-level abortion ban bills,
only bills which
are 100% personhood / surgical abortion ban / right to life bills,
or which
have at the most a "life of the mother" exception will even be
listed and
publicized. In truth, the "life of the mother" bills also fall
short, not only
of God's eternal standard of Biblical Truth (Exodus 20:13), but
also of
US Constitutional standards, violating the Equal Protection clause.
"Exceptions" to a ban on abortion are unconstitutional, as illustrated
in the text of the Roe v. Wade decision itself:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=410&invol=113
Over 20% of the States in America had active abortion ban bills
of various kinds in the 2005-2006
legislative year, if both 1) bills banning all surgical
abortions, as well as 2) bills banning some
combination of so-called "exceptions" to a complete ban
on child-murder-by-abortion, are counted.
11 State bills in 2005/2006 banning
abortions:
- ALA, GA, IND, KY, LA, MO, ND, OH, SC, SD, TENN (over 20% of States
in U.S.)
www.christianlifeandliberty.net/H3213-S111-121.doc
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This year, if there are other states beside: Georgia, Montana,
North Dakota,
South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia, which
have filed Abortion Ban bills
for the 2007 legislative session, please forward that information,
preferably with the bill number and/or the specific URL website
address for the bill, or for the state legislature, to:
Columbia Christians for Life <CCL@ChristianLifeandLiberty.net>
Thank you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes: 1) South Dakota has introduced a bill which
includes so-called "exceptions"
to a ban on child-murder-by-abortion in cases of rape, incest,
"life of the
mother", and the "health" of the mother, and will not be included
on this list.
2) Utah has introduced a bill which includes so-called
"exceptions" to a ban
on child-murder-by-abortion in cases of rape, incest, "to avert
a woman's
death", and "to avert a serious risk of substantial and irreversible
impairment of a major bodily function", and will not be included
on this list.
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
The 1973 Roe decision stated that if legal "personhood" was vested
for the unborn, that the pro-abortion argument would then collapse.
For almost 34 years now, the pro-life movement has failed to achieve
that
goal by a state-level, statutory declaration that
pre-birth human beings are
legal "persons" at fertilization, without exception. As
illustrated by the
Roe decision itself, "exceptions" to legal personhood are unconstitutional:
Right to Life Act of SC - news conference
and "Jesus Christ is Lord of the Gates" pro-life rally - Jan. 17,
2006
http://www.christianlifeandliberty.net/H3213-S111-1032.doc
p://www.christianlifeandliberty.net/H3213-S111-1032.doc
In the very text of the Roe v. Wade US supreme Court decision it
states, "[Texas] argue[s] that
the fetus is a "person" within the language and meaning of the
Fourteenth Amendment
If this suggestion of personhood is established, the [pro-abortion]
case, of course, collapses,
for the fetus right to life would then be guaranteed
specifically by the [14th] Amendment."
In other words, there never would have been legalized abortion
under Roe v. Wade. But tragically,
Texas had an "exception" which undermined their entire "personhood"
argument. Justice Harry
Blackmun wrote: "[ Footnote
54 ] When Texas urges that
a fetus is entitled to Fourteenth
Amendment protection as a person, it faces a dilemma. Neither in
Texas nor in any other
State are all abortions prohibited. Despite broad proscription,
an exception always exists
But if the fetus is a person who is not to be deprived of life
without due process of law, and
if the mother's condition is the sole determinant, does not the
Texas exception appear to be
out of line with the Amendment's
command? ..." http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=410&invol=113
The Right to Life Act of SC, in statutorily vesting legal "personhood"
at fertilization for
ALL human beings, satisifies the Roe formula published 33
years ago. The issue of legal "personhood"
for ALL human beings, without exception, is a key
to unlocking the 33 year old Roe v. Wade abortion enigma.
Jesus said, "... I will build My church; and the gates of hell
shall not prevail against it."
Matthew 16:18
Steve Lefemine, pro-life missionary
dir., Columbia Christians for Life
PO Box 50358, Columbia, SC 29250
(803) 765-0916
www.ChristianLifeandLiberty.net (click on "RTL Act of SC")
www.RighttoLifeActofSC.net
February 1, 2007
|